Stop Obsessing Over How Many LinkedIn Followers You Have. Focus on These Key Metrics Instead

Although the idea of followers has existed in various forms since the late 1990s, it was Twitter (now X) that first harnessed the modern follower concept in 2006.  LinkedIn came to this party late, essentially remaining a digital rolodex where you could connect with like-minded businesspeople until around 2011. It wasn’t until 2012 that the platform started allowing people to follow hand-picked influencers like Bill Gates, only letting people follow strangers without connecting in 2014. By 2021, following had become the default outreach action over connecting.

The rationale was obvious. If its greatest future value lay in scaling as a social media platform, and not purely as a business directory, then that scale could only come from audience, not connections. A single person might be able to physically accept a bulk load of connection requests at a time, but followers can accumulate 24/7 without action from the person being followed, quickly building a vast, selective, message-receptive audience far more conducive to monetization.

Through this mechanism, rewards earned by leading voices quickly turned them into a LinkedIn creator class. Names like Jasmin Alić, Lara Acosta and Justin Welsh have become familiar to regular users—they are now established voices blessed with public speaking invites, sponsorship opportunities, online tutorials and so on, not to mention the ability to openly boost their own personal business interests.

Yet right around late 2023, it became obvious that something was fishy in the world of LinkedIn followers. Influencers who’d spent nearly a decade assiduously stockpiling followers started to find that not all of them were being notified every time they posted.

Fast forward to 2026, and for the first time, LinkedIn itself (not to mention some of the sharpest algorithm analysts on the platform such as Melonie Dodaro and Richard van der Blom) has bluntly come out and said it: followers are no longer a key factor in building scale. In fact, for most people, the chance is that the vast majority of followers won’t even see the things you post on a weekly basis.  And what should you do instead to build scale?

Take one of the key changes identified by analyst Richard van der Blom in his recent 2026 algorithm report: topic consistency. Instead of lightly researched (or heaven forbid, AI-created) hit-and-hope posts about whatever topic takes your fancy, the platform now rewards subject experts.

Let’s take another metric: save-to-impression ratio. To understand this ratio, ask yourself: Are people casually cruising your content while waiting for their Zoom to start, like some kind of over-caffeinated LinkedIn window shopper? Or does your advice (or article) actually strike a chord with people—so much so that they save it? If so, this act of saving would seem to confer the post with a far deeper engagement signal than, say, a simple like or a laughing emoji.  Or what about completion rate? Namely, are people getting to the end of your video, carousel, or lengthy post about the current quality of AI-designed packaging for dog grooming products? A lifetime ago, back in 2025, carousels were the de rigeur format for those wishing to sort-of-game the system by generating clicks through highly-designed, 27-slide decks about every subject on earth. (Full disclosure: I actually lost many hours experimenting with these on my own feed, mainly when I first licensed Canva. Impressions were decent but not astronomic.)  Nowadays, there are only carousel crickets, for the pure reason that unclicked slides will actively hurt your reach, not benefit it.

Wrap into these other key metrics such as engagement from relevant professionals, meaningful comment-leaving, and AI-driven comparison of your profile against your professed subject areas, and you get the picture that LinkedIn is actively rewarding substantive, non-AI, value-led business content on its platform again. And it stands to reason. After all, who’d keep paying for a LinkedIn Premium account if they felt their latest corporate release was getting drowned out by less qualified voices who simply shout louder?

Of course, it goes without saying that all of this is for naught if you don’t have something tangible to say, and a unique way of saying it. After all, we can all study a hundred ways to write a book. But it’s only those with a voice worth hearing that eventually build a following that means something.

show less